Zum Inhalt springen
Menü
Sie müssen registriert sein, um mit der Community zu interagieren.
Diese Frage wurde gekennzeichnet
1 Antworten
4756 Ansichten

Instead of calling update_some_regular_fields() method at the end of overwritten create() and write() methods, why can't I just decorate update_some_regular_fields() method with @api.onchange() or @api.depends()? This would shorten the code considerably and make it readable, but the decorators seem to only react on changes from UI and ignore all other programmatic changes to DB records.

Also, with self being a virtual record in the onchange method, changes to records other than self are obviously ignored.

Maybe it's more of a feature request?

Avatar
Verwerfen
Beste Antwort

Hy,


For the onchange, it's legitim to consider that only one 1 record must be concerned because it's about client behaviour.

For the depends, I think it shoudl be compute one by one but could be done on multiple records. (eg via mass editing)

regards

Avatar
Verwerfen
Verknüpfte Beiträge Antworten Ansichten Aktivität
2
Apr. 25
2762
3
Nov. 24
17399
1
Nov. 22
2974
2
Dez. 19
8043
1
März 19
3478